Stage IV

Advanced (stage IV) lung adenocarcinoma is an incurable disease. Treatment mostly consists of chemotherapy, which provides a consistent but small survival benefit. Standard therapy includes a platinum-doublet (pemetrexed or paclitaxel) often in combination with bevacizumab, followed by maintenance bevacizumab or pemetrexed. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is a T-cell surface receptor that when activated, delivers a negative signal to T cells. This feedback mechanism dampens immune responses when no longer needed, preventing damaging autoimmune reactions. Tumors can co-opt this T-cell control mechanism to escape surveillance and/or rejection by the immune system. Thus, reversing this tumor action can result in antitumor activity worthy of clinical evaluation. Recently it has been demonstrated that inhibition of the PD-1 receptor with an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (nivolumab) has significant clinical activity in lung cancer with an ORR of 26%. As remarkable as this may be, given the heavily pretreated population of lung cancer patients studied, this also indicates that 74% of patients did not respond and remained resistant to this approach. Therefore, going forward it is important to develop combination therapies to improve the efficacy of this approach, and to discover resistance mechanisms that may allow for better patient (and tumor) selection. One potential class of agents to be used in combination with anti-PD-1 is the adenosine A2AR antagonists. Given that A2AR on T cells within the tumor microenvironment contributes to immune escape and therapeutic resistance, the addition of PBF-509 is expected to improve the efficacy of nivolumab.

Better methods are required to accurately risk stratify patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) who may undergo unnecessary procedures to exclude a cancer diagnosis. 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a widely available clinical test used to evaluate concerning SPNs and stage malignant lung nodules. It therefore facilitates clinical assessment but remains an imperfect tool for the diagnosis, localization, and prognostication of SPNs, be they infectious or malignant in nature. Furthermore, it performs well for staging lung cancer, but inaccurately categorizes patients in some cases who receive futile thoracotomies for disseminated disease, or conversely, are undertreated for localized disease. The applicant therefore plans on investigating whether circulating molecular biomarkers can increase the utility of 18F-FDG-PET imaging in clinical practice using statistical models that incorporate in vivo and in vitro diagnostics The concept here is “one-stop shopping,” where a patient can obtain routine molecular imaging and molecular diagnostics from routine blood work during an appointment that in combination increase the accuracy of a clinician’s diagnosis and facilitate the appropriate decision-making process. For this proposal we will develop a model that incorporates a circulating microRNA profile to discriminate infectious from malignant SPNs for patients along with clinical and FDG-PET data and, secondly, identify patients with malignant nodules and detectable circulating tumor cells to determine whether these cells upstage or augment clinical staging or prognosis post-operatively when compared to FDG-PET alone.

The genotype-directed use of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients has fundamentally changed the face of the disease with improved response to therapy, preserved quality of life, and prolonged progression-free survival. However, tumors that initially respond become resistant after ~ 1 year (i.e., acquired resistance, AR). The biology of AR is incompletely understood and is largely inferred from pre-clinical models. Our group at Mass General implemented a wide-scale program to perform repeat biopsies on EGFR-mutant patients with AR to first-generation EGFR inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib). This translational research paradigm has been instrumental in gaining insight into AR and has led to novel observations such as PIK3CA and BRAF mutations as mechanisms of AR and the abundant frequency of phenotypic changes at the time of AR like small cell lung cancer and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. The repeat biopsy results have directly helped our patients as well, by informing choices about the most relevant clinical trials or alternative treatments. Currently, a new cohort of EGFR TKIs is entering the clinic: 2^nd-generation irreversible pan-HER inhibitors and 3^rd-generation T790M-specific inhibitors. Little is known about how AR develops to these newer therapies or how the biology of EGFR-mutant cancers evolves over time after exposure to sequential EGFR blockers.

Our proposal aims to discover the mechanisms of AR to next-generation EGFR TKIs and to understand the evolution of EGFR-mutant cancers as they face the selective pressure of sequential types of EGFR-directed therapies. To accomplish this we will collaborate across institutions to amass a large number of pre-treatment and post-treatment paired patient biopsies which we will interrogate via allele-specific genotyping as well as whole genome sequencing to define mechanisms of AR. In addition we will utilize an innovative technique of taking tumor tissue directly from a biopsy and deriving patient-specific in vitro and in vivo models in the laboratory. Expansion of these models will yield a larger supply of AR cancer material to aid descriptive and functional research about the biology of AR. In addition, establishment of pre-treatment patient-specific models will allow us to verify whether the mechanism of AR derived in the lab through ex-vivo therapy mirrors the eventual clinical mode of AR.