Immunotherapy

Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC, but resistance to all ALK TKIs (including alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib) has been reported and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. Once patients develop resistance to available ALK inhibitors, they are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy rather than immunotherapy since response rates to PD-1 pathway inhibitors in this population are very low. However, our work in mouse models of ALK+ NSCLC has demonstrated that a vaccine generated against the rearranged portion of ALK can both prevent the development of ALK+ tumors and also more effectively treat them once they arise. We have also recently found evidence for anti-ALK immune responses in patients, as a subset of them generate spontaneous ALK autoantibodies.

We aim to translate our preclinical findings to a first-in-human clinical trial. Aim 1 will test the safety and efficacy of a novel ALK vaccine + an amphiphilic CpG toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant, administered in combination with an ALK TKI or PD-1 inhibitor in patients with TKI-resistant ALK-positive NSCLC. In Aim 2, using liquid chromatography data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, we will directly identify antigenic ALK peptides presented by MHC molecules on the surface of cancer cells from tumor biopsies obtained on trial participants. In Aim 3, we will study pre- and post-vaccination anti-ALK T-cell responses among trial participants by analyzing peripheral leukocytes and intratumoral immune cells. The overarching goal is to develop a vaccine that stimulates patients’ immune cells to recognize and eliminate ALK+ tumors.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive, neuroendocrine malignancy that accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancers. Despite recent advances, including the approval of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for frontline treatment, the median overall survival for patients with extensive-stage SCLC remains approximately one year. These dismal outcomes are attributable, in part, to the lack of approved biomarkers for SCLC, which, in turn, is due to the dearth of available tissue for molecular analysis. Using transcriptomic data, we have developed a gene signature that defines four distinct molecular subtypes of SCLC – each with unique biology and therapeutic vulnerabilities. These subtypes are driven by the presence (or absence) of three transcription factors (ASCL1 – SCLC-A; NEUROD1 – SCLC-N; POU2F3 – SCLC-P; and a fourth triple-negative subtype “Inflamed” – SCLC-I) that are largely mutually exclusive. Our preliminary data suggests that inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity among these subtypes drives response and resistance to standard and novel therapies for SCLC, including classes such as PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and immunotherapy. We propose applying bulk and single-cell molecular approaches to assign and longitudinally monitor subtype among our established cohort of patient-derived xenograft models treated with PARPi, as well as patient tumor biopsies from an investigator-initiated trial assessing a PARPi/immunotherapy combination. Based on our preliminary data, we hypothesize that SCLC-P and SCLC-I will preferentially benefit from PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy, respectively, and that subtype shifts detectable at the single-cell level along with accompanying shifts in the composition of the immune microenvironment, will govern response and resistance.

This project describes a 3-year training program for a career as a physician-scientist with the long term goal of establishing a research program within the field of translational thoracic oncology. The applicant is currently an Instructor of Medicine in the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic oncology conducting research in developing biomarkers for the treatment selection and monitoring of patients with lung cancer. The research focus of this proposal is to develop molecular markers to better identify the subgroup of patients that will respond to PD1/PDL1 therapies in order to avoid unnecessary toxicities, reduce costs, and enable more appropriate therapies to be delivered. This goal will be accomplished in two complementary specific aims. In Specific Aim 1, a novel approach to acquire fresh tissue samples for immunophenotyping will be utilized to prospectively determine the ability of deep T cell phenotyping and functional assays to predict response to anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy using multi-parametric flow cytometry. In Specific Aim 2, a newly developed technique that enables the quantitative measurement of circulating PDL1 exosomes will be utilized to determine the association of pretreatment and on-treatment exosomal PDL1 expression levels to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving checkpoint blockade. The training component of this proposal includes formal coursework, participation in a rich environment of post-doctoral lectures in thoracic oncology/tumor immunology, acquisition of advanced laboratory techniques, and individual mentoring. This project will take place under the supervision of Dr. Steven Albelda who is the Director of the Thoracic Oncology Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania and Co-Director of the Abramson Cancer Center’s Translational Center of Excellence for Lung Cancer Immunobiology, and Dr. Anil Vachani who is the Director of Clinical Research for the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology at Penn. Dr. Albelda and Dr. Vachani have mentored over 100 trainees. In addition, an advisory committee of distinguished scientists will provide experimental assistance, intellectual guidance, and career advice throughout the duration of this award.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated profound effects on the anti-tumor immune response and has revolutionized the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While chemotherapy has traditionally been viewed as detrimental to the immune system, recent clinical trials have demonstrated an impressive survival benefit when combining checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy (ICB+chemo) relative to chemotherapy alone. Despite this, many NSCLC patients do not achieve clinical benefit from ICB, even when combined with chemotherapy. The role of tumor mutational burden, and specifically T cells targeting neoantigens derived from these mutations, has been demonstrated in several ICB studies, however these factors have yet to be fully explored in chemotherapy-containing ICB treatment regimens. There is thus an urgent need to understand the effects of ICB+chemo on the anti-tumor immune response and to specifically evaluate how chemotherapy perturbs the phenotype and function of anti-tumor T cells. It is of paramount importance that we understand how PD-1 blockade and chemotherapy synergize to promote anti-tumor immunity in order to better stratify patients most likely to benefit from these treatments. We propose herein to perform the first comprehensive evaluation of the phenotype and function of neoantigen-specific T cells and their dynamics before and after treatment with ICB+chemo relative to ICB alone. The findings from this study will provide a detailed atlas of the immune system dynamics following treatment and will result in the development of an immunometabolic signature that will be correlated with clinical outcome. Importantly, the results of the proposed work will deepen our understanding of the immune response to ICB+chemo and will unravel the mechanisms underlying clinical response in NSCLC patients.

Targeted therapies, such as ALK inhibitors, represent a major advance in the treatment of lung cancer patients with specific oncogenic drivers. However, these patients relapse due to acquired or intrinsic resistance to these agents. While targeting immnoevasive pathways, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown efficacy in a subset of lung cancer patients who have progressed on other therapies, the response rate in ALK-positive lung cancer to these agents is very low, underscoring the need to identify other potential regulators of the anti-tumor immune response. The complement pathway is a component of the innate immune response, which regulates the adaptive immune system. Complement activation, initiated through multiple pathways, leads to a series of proteolytic cascades that generate inflammatory mediators designated as anaphylatoxins (C3a, C5a).

Our laboratory has employed an immunocompetent orthotopic model of lung cancer progression, where lung cancer cells are implanted into the lungs of syngeneic mice. To study pathways regulating progression of ALK-positive lung cancer, we have developed a panel of murine lung cancer cell lines with the oncogenic driver EML4/ALK. Using both genetic and pharmacological approaches we have demonstrated that while these tumors are resistant to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy, they are strongly inhibited by blocking the complement pathway. This project will define the mechanisms of complement activation, and the cellular and molecular mechanisms whereby complement inhibition blocks ALK-positive tumor progression. Studies will test a panel of complement inhibitors targeting different steps in the complement cascade and validate complement activation in human ALK-positive lung tumors.

ALK rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of NSCLC and confer sensitivity to treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These agents have produced dramatic improvements in clinical outcomes among ALK-rearranged (ALK+) patients, yet acquired resistance remains a major challenge. Thus, there is an urgent need for alternative therapeutic approaches for this disease. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting negative regulators of the immune response (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1) have emerged as powerful new therapies in NSCLC. In preliminary analyses, we and others have observed that ALK+ lung cancers are generally less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesize that distinct immune-based strategies may therefore be needed for ALK+ lung cancers. To inform these strategies, we will investigate 1) tumor-intrinsic factors associated with immunogenicity in ALK+ tumors (e.g., neoantigens, tumor mutation burden), 2) tumor-immune cell interactions (e.g., PD-L1 expression, alternative checkpoint expression, antigen presentation), and 3) endogenous T cell responses against ALK in the peripheral blood. Together, these studies may lay the groundwork for development of biomarkers informing optimal delivery of PD-(L)1 therapy in ALK+ lung cancers, while also promoting the development of novel combinations and approaches, including autologous cellular therapies directed against ALK.

Several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but resistance to all ALK TKIs (including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) has been reported and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. Once patients develop resistance to available ALK inhibitors, they are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy rather than immunotherapy since response rates to PD-1 pathway inhibitors in this population are very low. However, our work in mouse models of ALK-positive NSCLC has demonstrated that a vaccine generated against the rearranged portion of ALK can both prevent the development of ALK-positive tumors and also more effectively treat them once they arise. In addition, we have recently found evidence of an anti-ALK immune response in patients, as a subset of them generate spontaneous ALK autoantibodies.

To more deeply characterize anti-ALK immunologic responses in patients, we propose (Aim 1) to determine if the presence of anti-ALK antibodies correlates with progression-free and overall survival among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, and (Aim 2) to directly identify and validate antigenic ALK peptides in different HLA-haplotype backgrounds. Antigenic peptides that are identified through these studies will serve as the basis for a therapeutic ALK peptide vaccine clinical trial, for which funding has been secured independently.

Statement of the Problem: Cancer develops in a sequenced manner. Patches of lung cells gain the ability to multiply faster than their neighboring normal cells by acquiring mutations. These patches of cells are called “premalignant lesions" (PMLs). Some of these lesions may eventually become cancer. Knowledge about how some PMLs may develop into lung cancer is central to developing tools for Cancer Interception—interrupting the cancer development process and blocking progression to advanced metastatic disease. However, we lack effective lung cancer interception approaches due to our incomplete understanding of the earliest molecular events associated with the development of lung cancer, as well as the challenge in developing personalized tools for early detection and prevention.

Proposed Solution: The Dream Team will use a holistic approach to understand the genetics, immunology, radiological (imaging) profile, and treatment response of patients who show evidence of abnormal lung tissue that puts them at high risk to develop lung cancer. The Team has access to unique groups of patient populations (adenocarcinoma—ADC and squamous cell carcinoma—SCC) with signs of lung cancer risk, and has assembled a collection of blood and tissue specimens from these individuals. The main objective of the Team is to understand how lung cancer develops and test methods that will block the development of cancer. Their three-pronged approach to solve this problem will include:

• Creation of a molecular pre-cancer genome atlas (PCGA) of the lung with the goal of identifying which types of precancerous lung tissue require aggressive treatment and which treatments will block the development of these abnormal lesions to invasive lung cancer.
• Development of two diagnostic tools that can be directly applied in the clinic for simple, yet accurate, detection of early lung cancer: 1) the use of nasal swabs, blood tests, and imaging to confirm whether lung abnormalities found on chest imaging are lung cancer or benign lung disease. 2) blood tests that can identify patients at the earliest stages of lung cancer recurrence, thus enabling their timely and effective intervention with therapies such as those that boost the immune system.
• Development of tests to identify which individuals are most likely to benefit from a number of treatment strategies to intercept lung cancer, including emerging immunotherapies.

Immune-targeted agents have generated antitumor responses that are transforming cancer therapeutics in various tumors types including lung cancer. Despite the impressive responses observed, the majority of patients eventually experience therapeutic resistance after an initial response. Considering the increased cost to patients and health systems both financially and in terms of time spent in management of immune-related adverse effects it has become clear that success of immuno-oncology approaches depends on choosing patient populations most likely to benefit. Our proposed research addresses the urgent unmet clinical need to understand the underlying biology of response and develop molecular assays of response and resistance to immune targeted agents. We propose comprehensive genome-wide analyses of tumors and cell-free circulating DNA to examine how cancer genomes change during immune checkpoint blockade. Our approach is focused on discovery of mechanisms of resistance using a multidimensional strategy that combines comprehensive genomic analyses with functional assays of autologous T-cell reactivity. The underlying premise of this proposal is that through our comprehensive molecular analyses, we will identify changes in the genomic landscape of tumors during immune checkpoint blockade that mediate emergence of primary and acquired resistance to these therapies. Unravelling the genomic mechanisms through which cancer adapts to evade anti-tumor immune responses will be critical for future development of tailored cancer immunotherapy strategies. We envision that the results of the proposed research will be used to develop patient-specific immunotherapy approaches in lung cancer and will launch investigator-initiated clinical trials at Hopkins and other institutions.

Side effects of immune checkpoint therapies, termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), are unique and generally secondary to inflammatory tissue damage. The onset and duration of irAEs are unpredictable and predisposing factors for individuals to develop irAEs remains unclear. Some irAEs that emerge with immune checkpoint blockade share clinical features of autoimmune conditions. Preexisting auto-reactive antibodies and their contribution to immune side effects with immunotherapy and radiation have not been defined. This maybe particularly relevant to immune related adverse effects, since recent studies suggest almost 8-9% of the US population carries autoimmune diseases and 26% of healthy individuals have strong IgG humoral responses to variety of self-antigens. For the proposed study, we will use a set of longitudinally collected patient blood samples from a clinical trial which evaluates the clinical activity of combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without local consolidative therapy (stereotactic body irradiation) 

We plan to follow preexisting auto-reactive antibodies, baseline T and B cell receptor clonality and their temporal dynamics for combination immune checkpoint therapy with or without radiation therapy and correlate these findings with irAEs and response to therapy.